Descriptive Title: Proportion of population living at or below 200% of the Census Poverty Threshold
Geographic Unit of Analysis: Census tract
|Proportion of population living below 200% of the Census poverty threshold (2005-2009)|
|Neighborhood||% living below 200% CPT*||90% MOE**|
|Financial District/South Beach||34%||11%|
|Golden Gate Park||NA||NA|
|South of Market||44%||5%|
|West of Twin Peaks||12%||2%|
There is a strong correlation between people that live below the poverty level and infant mortality, heart disease, cancers, and homicide. Residents of high-poverty neighborhoods live about eight fewer years than non-poverty neighborhoods. People who live in poverty also tend to suffer from social deprivation and hopelessness, which over extended periods of time can cause long term changes in the immune system and brain.a Poverty institutes barriers on everyday life such as poor nutrition, lack of preventive medical services, unhealthy housing conditions and social isolation. Segregated low-income neighborhoods host unwanted land uses such as power plants, solid and hazardous waste sites, and bus yards.b Freeways and other busy roadways often run through low-income neighborhoods resulting in disproportionately higher exposure to noise and air pollution. Residents are often isolated from economic opportunities and marginalized in political decision-making, limiting their ability to effect change in their circumstances.c,d
In San Francisco, approximately one quarter of the population (26%) live below 200% of the Census poverty threshold. The Chinatown and Downtown/Civic Center neighborhoods have the highest percentage of population living below 200% of the Census poverty threshold (68& and 55% respectively). Additional high poverty areas occur in the Bayview, Visitacion Valley and South of Market neighborhoods. Neighborhoods with the lowest percentage of population living below 200% of the Census poverty threshold include Marina, West of Twin Peaks and Pacific Heights.
The poverty level is determined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Poverty is measured by using 48 thresholds that vary by family size, number of children within the family and age of the householder. The U.S. Census Bureau defines poverty as follows: If the total income of a person's family is less than the threshold appropriate for that family, then the person is considered poor, together with every member of his or her family. If a person is not living with anyone related by birth, marriage, or adoption, then the person’s own income is compared with his or her poverty threshold.
In determining the poverty status of families and unrelated individuals, the Census Bureau uses thresholds (income cutoffs) arranged in a two-dimensional matrix. The matrix consists of family size (from one person to nine or more people) cross-classified by presence and number of family members under 18 years old (from no children present to eight or more children present). Unrelated individuals and two-person families are further differentiated by age of reference person (RP) (under 65 years old and 65 years old and over).
To determine a person's poverty status, one compares the person's total family income in the last 12 months with the poverty threshold appropriate for that person's family size and composition. If the total income of that person's family is less than the threshold appropriate for that family, then the person is considered "below the poverty level," together with every member of his or her family. If a person is not living with anyone related by birth, marriage, or adoption, then the person's own income is compared with his or her poverty threshold.
Since American Community Survey (ACS) is a continuous survey, people respond throughout the year. Because the income questions specify a period covering the last 12 months, the appropriate poverty thresholds are determined by multiplying the base-year poverty thresholds (1982) by the average of the monthly inflation factors for the 12 months preceding the data collection. In 2009 the poverty threshold for two adults and a child under 18 was $17,268 (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/thresh09.html). Becuase San Francisco and the Bay Area has a higher than average cost of living we chose to examine the percent of persons living at or below 200% of the poverty threshold, which would have been $34,536 for the same family in 2009.
The equation used to determine percent below the poverty level is: Percent in poverty = Total persons at or below 200% of the poverty level / Total population with poverty status determined.
In the Percent of Population Living at or Below 100% of the Census Poverty Threshold graph, the Hispanic / Latino category is not a mutually exclusive race category. In the ACS, race and Hispanic origin are treated as separate concepts with a separate question asking about Hispanic origin. Hispanics or Latinos are people who classified themselves in at least one of the specific Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino census categories. People of Hispanic origin may also be of any race, and are asked to answer a race question by marking one or more race categories, including: White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and Some Other Race. Thus, the listed races such as Asian or Black/African American, may include some persons who identify as Hispanic. In order to better demostrate disparities in povery by race, non-Hispanic whites are included as a mutually exclusive race category.
The ACS is a sample survey, and thus, data are estimates rather than counts. Estimates have accompanying margins of error that indicate the span of values that the true value could fall within. Margins of error should be subtracted from and added to the value to determine the range of possible values. If the margin of error is too big relative to the value, data are not shown because they are statisitcally unstable. A coefficient of variation of 30% was used to determine statistical instability.
The poverty level is determined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Poverty is measured by using 48 thresholds that vary by family size, number of children within the family and age of the householder. The U.S. Census Bureau defines poverty as follows: If the total income of a person's family is less than the threshold appropriate for that family, then the person is considered poor, together with every member of his or her family. If a person is not living with anyone related by birth, marriage, or adoption, then the person"s own income is compared with his or her poverty threshold.
The equation used to determine percent below the poverty level is: Neighborhood Poverty = Total persons below the poverty level last year / Total population with poverty status determined.
American Community Survey (ACS), 5-year Estimates, 2005-2009.
Map, table, and graphic created by San Francisco Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Section using ArcGIS software.
Map data is presented at the level of the census tract. The map also includes planning neighborhood names, in the vicinity of their corresponding census tracts.
Table data is presented by planning neighborhood. Planning neighborhoods are larger geographic areas than census tracts. SFDPH chose to use the San Francisco Planning Department's census tract neighborhood assignments to calculate neighborhood values. This assignment method relies on a 'centroids within' methodology to convert census tracts to geographic mean center points. Census tracts are assigned to planning neighborhoods based on the spatial location of those geographic mean center points and neighborhood totals are calculated for the table. In a few case, certain census tracts were redesignated to different neighborhoods based on knowledge of the population dispersion in the tract.
Lantz PM, Pritchard. A. Socioeconomic indicators that matter for population health. Prev Chronic Dis 2010;7(4).
Maantay J. Zoning, equity, and public health. Am J of Pub Health. 2001;91:1033-1041.
Wilson WJ. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
Bullard RD. Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder: Westview, 1990.